Skip to content

Conversation

@jessica-mitchell
Copy link
Contributor

using Cursor AI

@jessica-mitchell jessica-mitchell added the S: Normal Handle this with default priority label Jun 25, 2025
@jessica-mitchell jessica-mitchell added T: Maintenance Work to keep up the quality of the code and documentation. I: No breaking change Previously written code will work as before, no one should note anything changing (aside the fix) labels Jun 25, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to In progress in PyNEST-NG Jun 25, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

Pull request automatically marked stale!

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale Automatic marker for inactivity, please have another look here label Aug 25, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the stale Automatic marker for inactivity, please have another look here label Nov 8, 2025
@jessica-mitchell
Copy link
Contributor Author

@heplesser I have a recurring failing test in the CI for several of these PRs related to the mpi test test_consistent_local_vps

FAILED result/share/nest/testsuite/pytests/mpi/4/test_consistent_local_vps.py::test_consistent_local_vps - unittest.case.SkipTest: NEST was compiled without multi-threading

A suggestion from AI was to switch the skip logic from @unittest.skipIf(not HAVE_OPENMP, "NEST was compiled without multi-threading") to @pytest.skipif . . . but I guess that might cause unittest to fail. Any thoughts on this?

@heplesser
Copy link
Contributor

@heplesser I have a recurring failing test in the CI for several of these PRs related to the mpi test test_consistent_local_vps

FAILED result/share/nest/testsuite/pytests/mpi/4/test_consistent_local_vps.py::test_consistent_local_vps - unittest.case.SkipTest: NEST was compiled without multi-threading

A suggestion from AI was to switch the skip logic from @unittest.skipIf(not HAVE_OPENMP, "NEST was compiled without multi-threading") to @pytest.skipif . . . but I guess that might cause unittest to fail. Any thoughts on this?

Fixed in master now (see #3629), please merge master into all open PRs.

@terhorstd terhorstd added the focus Issue/PR is part of the focused group of items in an ongoing coordinated effort. label Nov 14, 2025
@heplesser heplesser merged commit 88b1f9b into nest:master Nov 24, 2025
53 of 54 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In progress to Done in PyNEST-NG Nov 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

focus Issue/PR is part of the focused group of items in an ongoing coordinated effort. I: No breaking change Previously written code will work as before, no one should note anything changing (aside the fix) S: Normal Handle this with default priority T: Maintenance Work to keep up the quality of the code and documentation.

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants